Edwards' Example

Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 4:16pm.

John Edwards has been vocal on the campaign trail about the need to pass full public financing of elections and seriously address the corrosive influence private money has on our political process. With his announcement today that he will suspend his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination we felt it was only right to say something, and urge the remaining Democratic and Republican candidates to make support for full public financing of elections part of their message.


From Public Campaign Action Fund's David Donnelly:

 

“Senator Edwards raised serious issues of who controls Washington in his presidential campaign – and his message reverberated in both parties’ nomination contests. He leaves the race having elevated public awareness about the inextricable link between private special interest money in politics and how responsive government is to those most in need of a helping hand.

 

“The remaining Democratic candidates – Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama – have already joined him in his call for public financing of elections to put voters ahead of big campaign donors. Republican presidential candidates ought to follow suit and leave aside the empty rhetoric and band-aid fixes in favor of Edwards’ call for real reform and empowering voters.

 

“While Edwards is leaving the race for the White House today, we are hopeful that he will continue to engage the public with the same clarity of message and purpose to end the stranglehold wealthy donors have on our government.”

 

3 comments
. . . . .

Nyhart wrote in today's email that "Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL) on the record in support of public financing of elections,", but does that actually mean that they are in favor of public financing for themselves? Especially when the Dems stand to raise a lot more than the Repubs this year? Somehow I doubt it. It sounds like being on the record for ending the war but still continuing to vote to appropriate more funds to continue it.

It looks like the new records for campaign spending in 2008 will dwarf everything that came before. And let's not forget that Edwards is not in the race any more because he could not compete with the extremely expensive Clinton and Obama noise machines. Interestingly, it is McCain and Huckabee who have been managing to run viable campaigns with little $$$.

Public Campaign should be pressuring ALL the presidential candidates to run on public financing, pointing out that action, not words, is all that counts here.


Submitted by Clean Elections Friend (not verified) on Fri, 02/08/2008 - 5:42pm.

If we are ever to return the wonderful old belief of "government of the people for the people and BY the people" then, public campaign financing is the only way we'll ever see it happen. Any politician who refuses to accept it should not be allowed on the ballot.


Submitted by Ron grauer (not verified) on Fri, 02/08/2008 - 3:12pm.

This is just one of the reasons why Edwards was a necessary candidate and he will be missed.


Submitted by Clean Elections Friend (not verified) on Fri, 02/08/2008 - 2:50pm.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br /> <i> <b> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Relative links are made to be relative to the drupal root directory.
More information about formatting options