Profit Vs. Planet

Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Fri, 12/07/2007 - 11:42am.

Yesterday the House passed new energy legislation to increase fuel efficiency standards and repeal billions in tax subsidies to the oil and gas industry, but the bill can't even make to a vote in the Senate. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) led the Senate effort against the bill, with $576,900 in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry and another $107,00 from auto manufacturers to back him up.


Sen. McConnell seems ever more willing to do the bidding of his biggest campaign contributors. How else to explain opposition to new fuel efficiency standards when we stand a critical juncture for addressing global warming and greenhouse gas emissions? How else to justify huge tax breaks for oil companies when investment in alternative energy solutions is immediate?


We've released a statement pointing to McConnell's misplaced priorities on this legislation:


"With gas prices at record highs, it's unsettling that Sen. McConnell would carry the water for President Bush and big oil on an issue so important to Americans and the future of this country. [. . .] With worldwide consensus on the need to address global warming, it's time for Congress to take action. Unfortunately, Sen. McConnell seems more concerned about protecting the rising profits of oil companies instead of the devastating economic impact due to the rising temperatures of the earth.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has indicated that debate on this legislation will continue next week.

 

4 comments
. . . . .

I am from Kentucky and I am absolutely livid. I have always thought of Mitch McConnell as a shady character, but he's really much more than that. He is only concerned with himself, not the people he represents. He's evil.


Submitted by Jimmy in Lexington (not verified) on Thu, 05/29/2008 - 2:22pm.

Are you guys as sick of high fuel prices as I am? It's so sad that the US will spend 1,000,000,000 dollars a month on a war for oil yet they don't invest that much money into research for alternative transportation... you could higher so many scientists for that much money just think...

1,000,000,000 / 100,000 (Salary) = 10,000 Scientists

If you could get 10,000 scientist working for 1 year on the fuel crisis we would have a solution in no time... yet their greed is causing us to pay high fuel prices and pollute the environment even more...

I came by this link I found it interesting maybe you will too... driving on water seems like a bunch of ppl are trying to water down the gas with water somehow and get better fuel efficiency...


Submitted by Clean Elections Friend (not verified) on Fri, 05/23/2008 - 10:56am.

AK stands for Alaska. He is not from Alaska.


Submitted by Clean Elections Friend (not verified) on Mon, 12/10/2007 - 1:18pm.

Noted and corrected -- guess my brain left early for the weekend!


Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Tue, 12/11/2007 - 10:10am.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br /> <i> <b> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Relative links are made to be relative to the drupal root directory.
More information about formatting options