First Time Match-UpSubmitted by Katie Schlieper on Tue, 03/11/2008 - 4:21pm.
Emily Cadei at CQ Politics notes that this could be the first presidential elections to match up two vocal supporters of public financing of elections, in the form of Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama. She rightly identifies the glee with which we anticipate the topic of public financing receiving the attention it deserves, despite the barbs the candidates have been trading over the presidential public financing system.
Public-financing advocates concede that the system needs to be re-examined. “The spending limits in the primary election are too low,” Wertheimer said, noting that the ceiling works out to about $50 million — less than Obama raised in February alone. “Anyone who can raise money knows from the outset that if you go into that system and you happen to win the nomination, you’re going to be trapped.”
Bipartisan legislation has been introduced to fix the presidential program, and if we do in fact see a match-up of the potentially Presidential public financing proponents (us good government types like alliteration, too!) then we'll likely see some healthy debate on the particulars of those fixes, whether or not either candidate is using the public financing system.
3 comments
Making public financing the only money for presidential candidates might even the scales but places another debit on Federal debt now beyond 7 trillion in the hole. Also consider Nader drawing 10 million to muddle the election. Is public financing rea;;y a way to even the election? A possible way is to bill each state a percentage amount in proportion to population. This is the single most important thing that we can do to take back our country. No one in any office can truly represent the people if they are forced to raise millions of dollars to get elected. We also can't have any common people running for office because they don't have untold thousands of dollars to spend on a campaign. I am interested in learning more about the effects of changing to publicly financed elections. I read in the 1980s about how the election/campaign reforms of the 70s had only spawned more corruption. Before I commit myself to promoting public financing of elections, I would need to know whether the same would occur. Post new comment |
Paid for by... Tags
Abramoff(200)
campaign contributions(143)
Clean Elections(209)
Congress(352)
corruption(204)
lobbyists(154)
presidential race(147)
Public Financing(213)
scandal(155)
Texas(263)
Tom DeLay(757)
vote(158)
Popular Blog Posts
Blog Roll
|
powered by Drupal