High court agrees to hear WV judicial caseSubmitted by Adam Smith on Mon, 11/17/2008 - 6:03pm.
After a long delay, the U.S. Supreme Court announced on Friday it would hear an appeal from West Virginia concerning campaign finance and whether a state Supreme Court justice has the responsibility to recuse himself when a campaign contributor is affected.
So here's what happened. In 2002, the West Virginia Supreme Court ruled in favor of Harman Mining Corp that Massey Energy, "commandeered a coal supply agreement and forced the smaller company into bankruptcy." At the time, the verdict would have cost Massey $50 million. In 2004, Massey head Don Blankenship spent $4 million to get a favored candidate elected to the Supreme Court. Once elected, Justice Brent Benjamin ruled in Massey's favor twice.
During the appeals process, Benjamin refused to recuse himself from the case even though Blankenship and his money was a major reason he was elected. In July of thisĀ year, the original plaintiffs in the case asked the Supreme Court to hear the case. The court's decision could have a significant impact in West Virginia and the other 39 states that elect Supreme Court justices.
Hugh Caperton, a plaintiff in the case, had this to say:
He's right. Justice is supposed to be blind but it's disconcerting when interests invest millions of dollars to get specific judges elected--especially when they have cases before the court. We'll be following this one closely.
1 comment
Sorry. The function of science fiction is not always to predict the future but sometimes to prevent it. Thank you very much 8-). Umberto. Post new comment |
Paid for by... Tags
Abramoff(200)
campaign contributions(155)
Clean Elections(214)
Congress(364)
corruption(207)
lobbyists(158)
presidential race(147)
Public Financing(217)
scandal(155)
Texas(263)
Tom DeLay(757)
vote(158)
Popular Blog Posts
Blog Roll
|
powered by Drupal