<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Systematic Reform - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/27/systematic-reform</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Systematic Reform&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Systematic Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/27/systematic-reform</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The New York Times &lt;/em&gt;ran &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/washington/26earmarks.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ei=5094&amp;amp;en=0aebb98f7b701e08&amp;amp;hp=&amp;amp;ex=1164603600&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;partner=homepage&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1164517670-jKyfk5hQOZ55fJBYtWYS8w&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;this piece&lt;/a&gt; on Sunday suggesting that (surprise!) the earmarking issue is a birpartisan problem - despite the legacy of Duke Cunningham, Jack Abramoff and others, the soon-to-be Democrat-controlled Congress seems less than enthusiastic about shutting off the pipeline of pork.  </description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
