<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Rules are pesky things, huh? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2005/04/25/rules-are-pesky-things-huh</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Rules are pesky things, huh?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rules are pesky things, huh?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2005/04/25/rules-are-pesky-things-huh</link>
 <description>       [Ed. note: I didn&#039;t notice that I was making a second post on this... since I&#039;ve added some additional content from today&#039;s coverage, read down...]Jeffrey Smith of the Washington Post blows open another damning element of Tom DeLay&#039;s winin... </description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
