<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - On The Money - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/06/on-the-money</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;On The Money&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>On The Money</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/06/on-the-money</link>
 <description>Should the State Treasurer of North Carolina take campaign contributions from firms he hires to manage assets in the state&amp;#39;s pension fund? Should any state official be soliciting contributions from industries he or she does business with or exercises authority over?  Those questions are at the root of &lt;em&gt;The News and Observer&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/579/story/550073.html&quot;&gt;editorial in favor &lt;/a&gt;of public financing for statewide races so as to avoid this apparent conflicts of interest.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
