<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - My two cents about DeLay&#039;s &#039;victory&#039; yesterday - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/my-two-cents-about-delays-victory-yesterday</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;My two cents about DeLay&#039;s &#039;victory&#039; yesterday&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>My two cents about DeLay&#039;s &#039;victory&#039; yesterday</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/my-two-cents-about-delays-victory-yesterday</link>
 <description>       I know Rick wrote about this earlier, but I wanted to add my two cents...In 2004, in the general election, DeLay received 55% of the vote. Yesterday, in a low turnout, only-the-faithful-voting primary election, he got 62%, only slightly better... </description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
