<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Public Financing Where It Counts - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/23/public-financing-where-it-counts</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Public Financing Where It Counts&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Public Financing Where It Counts</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/23/public-financing-where-it-counts</link>
 <description>Nothing glazes the eyes like a treatise on campaign finance reform -- those three words calculated to enliven exactly no one -- so Dorothy Borgus and Neil Jaschik&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070523/OPINION02/705230336/1039/OPINION&quot;&gt; are right to use this editorial &lt;/a&gt;in the &lt;em&gt;Rochester Democrat and Chronicle&lt;/em&gt; to go beyond the nuts and bolts of policy to a list of concerns facing New Yorkers tied directly to the way elections are financed in their pitch for full public financing.</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
