<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Supreme Court&#039;s New Campaign Finance Ruling - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/26/supreme-court-opens-door-to-special-interests</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Supreme Court&#039;s New Campaign Finance Ruling&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Supreme Court&#039;s New Campaign Finance Ruling</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/26/supreme-court-opens-door-to-special-interests</link>
 <description>Big news from the Supreme Court yesterday which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/25/AR2007062500548.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&amp;amp;sub=AR&quot;&gt;decided on a 5-4 vote to loosen certain regulations&lt;/a&gt; established under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA, better known as the McCain-Feingold Act) to allow corporations and unions to air ads that mention a candidate&amp;#39;s name right up to election day.  It  likely means a larger influx of money from groups that traditionally run these ads, perhaps leading to a more expensive elections cycle. </description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
