<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Historical Notes - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/05/historical-notes</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Historical Notes&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Historical Notes</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/05/historical-notes</link>
 <description>Calling the history of reforming campaign finance laws &amp;quot;Sisyphean,&amp;quot; Jack Beatty &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200707u/campaign-finance&quot;&gt;writes in &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Online&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; on the recent Supreme Court ruling weakening certain provisions of BCRA and how the fight to counter the influence of money on U.S. elections is over 100 years old and nowhere near over.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
