<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Small Talk - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/18/small-talk</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Small Talk&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Small Talk</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/18/small-talk</link>
 <description>Yesterday the&lt;em&gt; New York Times&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/us/politics/17obama.html?ex=1185249600&amp;amp;en=b780aeebbc4c753c&amp;amp;ei=5123&amp;amp;partner=BREITBART&quot;&gt;tried to draw some new lines&lt;/a&gt; around what  qualifies someone as a &amp;quot;donor,&amp;quot; specifically when it comes to how Barack Obama counts his donors.  The &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; treats people who pay for a campaign sticker or button as something less than a donor (a real, live, check-writer).  Nick Nyhart, our President, takes a look at the faulty logic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nick-nyhart/making-5-count_b_56729.html&quot;&gt;in this featured &lt;em&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/em&gt; piece.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
