<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Two Steps Forward or Three Steps Back? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/09/two-steps-forward-or-three-steps-back</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Two Steps Forward or Three Steps Back?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Two Steps Forward or Three Steps Back?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/09/two-steps-forward-or-three-steps-back</link>
 <description>With President Bush still mulling over whether to sign the lobbying and ethics reform bill passed by Congress, there are those who are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.morningsun.net/stories/080907/opinion_1186635692.xml.shtml&quot;&gt;lauding&lt;/a&gt; legislative efforts to thwart corruption, and those &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/business/columnists/markowitz/s_521280.html&quot;&gt;lamenting &lt;/a&gt;that those laws need to be written in the first place.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
