<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - The Oprah Argument - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-oprah-argument</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The Oprah Argument&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Oprah Argument</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-oprah-argument</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-hsu21sep21,1,938478.story?coll=la-news-comment&amp;amp;ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true&quot;&gt;This one&amp;#39;s a bit of a head-scratcher.&lt;/a&gt;  The &lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt; compares Norman Hsu to Oprah Winfrey to illustrate the point that not all campaign bundlers are crooks. And while I grant them that premise I don&amp;#39;t buy that just because some bundlers are good people, bundling is a good thing.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
