<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Workable Solution - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/24/workable-solution</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Workable Solution&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Workable Solution</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/24/workable-solution</link>
 <description>Everyone is chewing over the bundler problem -- both in terms of the influence they exert over, and the potential liability they can be to candidates.  Some preach &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/politics/2007/09/21/campaigns-need-bundlers--until-they-do-something-wrong.html&quot;&gt;better background research&lt;/a&gt; on where the money is coming from and some, like the &lt;em&gt;Hartford Courant&lt;/em&gt;, counsel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-hsu.artsep24,0,5174329.story&quot;&gt;more sweeping reform.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
