]> http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/03/some-circumstantial-evidence-is-strong Comments for "Some Circumstantial Evidence Is Strong" en http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/03/some-circumstantial-evidence-is-strong#comment-86461 I do believe that the best way to increase the number of clean elections is to EXPOSE those known to be DIRTY (fixed) elections. Lets have a couple of examples to start us off with. Sincerely, Salvatore Galioto Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:29:54 +0000 http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/03/some-circumstantial-evidence-is-strong#comment-86460 Blackwater...I hope that it's my imagination because it seems that all the most obvious, money-oriented, dirty-est, most un-democratic, un-Christian decisions made in Congress are made by the Republicans. Could that be so? If it's true do they really expect to win ANY upcoming election? Be still my imagination...although... Blackwater does start with a "B" just like Boyscouts, Baseball, Bush & BS! Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:29:49 +0000 http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/03/some-circumstantial-evidence-is-strong Dana Milbank of the <em>Washington Post</em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/02/AR2007100202022.html"> speculates,</a> via strategically-placed parentheses, about the interest of certain members of Congress in holding Blackwater and other defense contractors accountable for their actions in Iraq. Are the contributions lining their campaign coffers causing some legislators to look the other way? Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:55:40 +0000