<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Firing Back - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/11/firing-back</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Firing Back&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Anti allergic</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/11/firing-back#comment-96423</link>
 <description>Good Day. Inspiration does exist, but it must find you working.
I am from Saudi and also am speaking English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: &quot;Anti allergic asthma anti allergic asthma.&quot;

Regards :) Keelan.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Firing Back</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/11/firing-back</link>
 <description>Wow, West Virginia&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;Charleston Daily Mail&lt;/em&gt; is becoming the latest sounding board for Clean Elections.  Following a negative editorial on public financing we saw Carol Warren&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2007/10/10/if-not-you-then-who&quot;&gt;editorial yesterday,&lt;/a&gt; now a letter from Craig Dunkerley of San Jose, CA in today&amp;#39;s edition.  The letter , which praises Clean Elections is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.com/story/Opinion/Letters+to+the+Editor/2007101147/Your-Views-Thursday-Oct-11-2007/&quot;&gt;available here&lt;/a&gt; (fourth down) and in it&amp;#39;s entirety after the jump.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
