<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Does BAE Stand for &quot;Bribery and Earmarks?&quot; - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/30/does-bae-stand-for-bribery-and-earmarks</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Does BAE Stand for &quot;Bribery and Earmarks?&quot;&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Does BAE Stand for &quot;Bribery and Earmarks?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/30/does-bae-stand-for-bribery-and-earmarks</link>
 <description>Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/story/214167.html&quot;&gt;raising eyebrows again&lt;/a&gt; for pushing an earmark worth $25 million for a company, BAE Systems, long suspected of bribing public officials. Oh and they&amp;#39;ve steered $53,000 to McConnell&amp;#39;s campaign account since 2002.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:18:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
