<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Earmark if You Believe in Ferries - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/15/earmark-if-you-believe-in-ferries</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Earmark if You Believe in Ferries&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Earmark if You Believe in Ferries</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/15/earmark-if-you-believe-in-ferries</link>
 <description>A &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; won&amp;#39;t pass muster anymore, but a boat to nowhere?  Hey, that&amp;#39;s worth trying.  Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), perhaps attempting to distract attention from &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2007/11/12/youre-on-crooked-camera&quot;&gt;his other scandals&lt;/a&gt;, has stuck a $20 million earmark into defense spending legislation to fund a ferry that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_61/news/21027-1.html&quot;&gt;looks to benefit&lt;/a&gt; no one so much as his scandal-tainted friends and former staffers who have development interests in the area the ferry would serve (&lt;em&gt;Roll Call&lt;/em&gt;, sub req.).</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
