<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Supremely Disappointing - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/27/supremely-disappointing</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Supremely Disappointing&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Supremely Disappointing</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/27/supremely-disappointing</link>
 <description>In a 5-4 split the Supreme Court delivered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91941975&quot;&gt;another very conservative campaign finance decision &lt;/a&gt;yesterday, ruling the &amp;quot;Millionaires&amp;#39; Amendment&amp;quot; provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform (BRCA) law unconstitutional.  While its impossible to say what the full implications of this decision are, its clear the Court is no friend to laws that seek to limit the influence of private money on our elections. </description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
