<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Million Reasons Why Not - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/30/million-reasons-why-not</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Million Reasons Why Not&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Million Reasons Why Not</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/30/million-reasons-why-not</link>
 <description>The editorial boards the &lt;em&gt;Washington Post &lt;/em&gt;and the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; are none too pleased with the Supreme Court ruling against the Millionaire&amp;#39;s Amendment provision in BCRA that provided rescue funds to candidates facing wealthy, self-financing opponents.  Read on for excerpts from the editorials.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
