<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Video Killed the Campaign Star - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/09/27/video-killed-the-campaign-star</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Video Killed the Campaign Star&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Video Killed the Campaign Star</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/09/27/video-killed-the-campaign-star</link>
 <description>The Center for Public Integrity has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/09/26/consultants_got_18_billion_in_04_election/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News+%2F+Nation&quot;&gt;released a report&lt;/a&gt; concluding the cost of a campaign in 2006 is eleven times that of one in 1976 - a period during which the cost of living went up only three times.  What&amp;#39;s driving this spike?  The huge chunk of money devoted to media and media consultants - and it&amp;#39;s turned candidates into, in the words of Sandy Bergo, &amp;quot;telemarketers.&amp;quot;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
