<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - More on the Money - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/09/more-on-the-money</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;More on the Money&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>More on the Money</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/09/more-on-the-money</link>
 <description>The Center for Responsive Politics has released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crp.org/pressreleases/2006/PostElection.11.8.asp&quot;&gt;its estimates &lt;/a&gt;on the cost of campaigns for the 2006 elections.  Overall, the big spenders were the big winners - among the decided House races the high spender was the winner 398 of 425 times.  Among decided Senate races, it was 22 out of 32.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
