<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - north carolina - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;north carolina&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>re: public financing of elections</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/10/promising-developments-in-north-carolina#comment-89406</link>
 <description>Certainly if a candidates wants to self-finance a run for office that&#039;s his or her right -- the problem arises when that is the only avenue for candidates to seek office without soliciting big contributions.  With public financing candidates who don&#039;t want to take big money, and who aren&#039;t wealthy enough to self-finance, also have a way to be competitive.</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>public financing of elections</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/10/promising-developments-in-north-carolina#comment-89377</link>
 <description>A lot has been said about individuals using their own money to run for office.  I personnally see nothing wrong in a person spending his own money to run for office.   That way, the public does not have to support his election and he is not beholden to the big money people.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I agree all elections should</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-88501</link>
 <description>I agree all elections should be financed publicly.




</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>public financing</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-78585</link>
 <description>  ALL elections should be financed publicly. There should be NO &quot;special interest&quot; money involved. Or should we say &quot;special thievery&quot; money. </description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Financing of all Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-78515</link>
 <description>I was very pleased that Sen. Edwards has endorsed the idea of public financing of all elections.  It is about time that the American voter has the opportunity to make their decisions based on the content of the candidate&#039;s character, rather than the depth of of their pockets.  The issue of character and leadership has never been more germain and relevant to the well-being of this nation, than it is at present.  Candidates need to speak to the American people, rather than attending fund raisers that ignore the common man and lures only the rich and powerful!</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John Edwards in the future endorsement of publicl campaigns</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-78503</link>
 <description>It&#039;s easy to understand, what Edwards said about Public Campaign financing on Friday.  the current systems is limited and broken.  It only covers presidential elections, and the limit on funds to accept federal funding is to small, to win a presdiential campaign, especially one that is waged in all 50 states.  given that that is the case and he is in the race to win it, not just to move the eventual nominee towrds his positions (ala Dennis Kucinich)  on the issues he must opt out.  given what Hillary and Barrack raised in the 1st quarter of 2007, it is likely that they will have raised the $150,000,000 limit before 2007 is finished!  while that money might not make or break any of the candidates in Iowa or New Hampshire, it sure is going to be a fator on February 5, 2007.  and probably will continue to be a factor, all the way to November 2008.  

Understanding that it&#039;s too late to change the rules for the 2008 presidential election cycle, Edwards  pointed out that a future president is going to have to lead us to a system of public financing for all federal elections (Presidents don&#039;t have jurisdiction over state and local elections!)  

He certainly did not make as forceful a statement as I might have wished, by saying that he would introduce legislation to congress within some number of days of his innaguration, but his signalled clearly which side of the issue he is on, if not how he intends to proceed to make public campaign financing a reality.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public financing of campaigns</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-78493</link>
 <description>I am glad John Edwards would support public financing of campaigns.  It has worked so well in Arizona and Maine for 4 elections.

It would keep politicians from spending so much time raising money and they could spend that time working to come up with ideas that help make America a better place for all Americans.  

Every year more and more money is being raise by candidates.  Public financing is the best way to change the current system so candidates are elected because they have the best ideas.

Good luck.</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John Edwards in the future endorsement of publicl campaigns</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-78487</link>
 <description>I&#039;m not sure what to make of John Edwards&#039; after- we&#039;ve-won-in-the-future-endorsement of publicaly funded campaigns.

This is a key issue that is undermining what politicians can or will do for the American people vs. private interests. 

Public Campaign should be doing some analysis of his and other politicians positions on this issue rather than merely accepting politicians word that in the future we&#039;ll attend to it. At the least Public Campaign should present the past records of candidates as a way of judging if they are likely sincere in their future endorsement of publicaly funded campaigns.</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>public financing</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment-78486</link>
 <description>The only way we can have honest elections and restore our Democracy is through public financing. As it is now the coporations are buying our politicians to work for them and the American people are left out. They are selling our country our from under us. Also, the elected officials have to spend most of their time raising money for the next elections, taking time away from doing government business. 
Sincerely, Helen Plaja</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
