<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Blackwater - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/blackwater</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Blackwater&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clean Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/03/some-circumstantial-evidence-is-strong#comment-86461</link>
 <description>I do believe that the best way to increase the number of clean elections is to EXPOSE those known to be DIRTY (fixed) elections.  Lets have a couple of examples to start us off with.

Sincerely,
Salvatore Galioto


</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Blackwater</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/03/some-circumstantial-evidence-is-strong#comment-86460</link>
 <description> 
Blackwater...I hope that it&#039;s my imagination because it seems that all the most obvious, money-oriented, dirty-est, most un-democratic, un-Christian decisions made in Congress are made by the Republicans. Could that be so? If it&#039;s true do they really expect to win ANY upcoming election? Be still my imagination...although... Blackwater does start with a &quot;B&quot; just like Boyscouts, Baseball, Bush &amp; BS!</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
