Statement On Big Oil Circus In HouseFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Fri, 08/01/2008 - 12:59pm Washington, D.C. — Campaign Money Watch, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group, released the following statement today from David Donnelly, its director, in response to speeches given on the floor of the U.S. House urging a vote on oil drilling: “As members of Congress pull a stunt today on the floor of the House regarding oil drilling, Campaign Money Watch urges all voters and reporters to go to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics’ website, OpenSecrets.org, and review how much each member of Congress received from the oil and gas industry over their careers. These contributions from Big Oil, more than anything else, will tell you what you need to know about today’s Big Oil circus.” A list of all members of Congress, and the contributions they’ve received from the oil and gas industry, can be found at http://opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=E01&recipdetail=H&sortorder=A&cycle=All. Campaign Money Watch is a project of the nonpartisan Public Campaign Action Fund. The organization works to hold candidates who are against reform accountable for where they get their political donations. printer friendly version | 290 reads
|
Press Releases Via Email!
Sign Up To Receive Our Press Releases Via Email! We'll send timely press alerts Paid for by... Our Blog
There go the frequent flier miles posted by Adam Smith on 11-19-2008 Well, it looks like Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) may not make it back to the Senate after all. While things looked good after the election, the AP has now called the race for his Democratic opponent Mark Begich. Published in: Alaska | corruption | Ted Stevens Make Fair Elections a Priority! posted by Adam Smith on 11-19-2008 So we now have more support for Fair Elections, or full public financing of elections, in Washington, D.C. than ever before. We need your help to make passing Fair Elections a priority. Published in: Congress | fair elections High court agrees to hear WV judicial case posted by Adam Smith on 11-17-2008 After a long delay, the U.S. Supreme Court announced on Friday it would hear an appeal from West Virginia concerning campaign finance and whether a state Supreme Court justice has the responsibility to recuse himself when a campaign contributor is affected. Published in: judicial | Supreme Court | West Virginia Read more posts from the "Paid for by..." blog |
powered by Drupal