<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - elections</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How Do You Feel About Democracy?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/10/how-do-you-feel-about-democracy</link>
 <description>The Midwest Democracy Network has a question for the 2008 slate of presidential candidates: what will you do to strengthen our democracy?  They&amp;#39;ve sent a questionnaire, which you can read&lt;a href=&quot;/files/mdnquestionnaire.pdf&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/files/mdnquestionnaire.pdf&quot;&gt;here, &lt;/a&gt;to the candidates asking for their positions on issues like public financing of presidential and congressional races, to voter registration, to what should be done about the &amp;quot;revolving door&amp;quot; between Congress and the lobby sector.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/10/how-do-you-feel-about-democracy&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/10/how-do-you-feel-about-democracy#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">200410 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Former Sen. Edwards Calls For Publicly Financed Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections</link>
 <description>This past Friday, former Senator and current presidential candidate John Edwards called for public financing of all elections during an interview on Real Time With Bill Maher. You can watch a clip of the interview after the jump.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/19/former-sen-edwards-call-for-publicly-financed-elections#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/democrat">democrat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-candidates">presidential candidates</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Bielke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">134464 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More on the Money</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/09/more-on-the-money</link>
 <description>The Center for Responsive Politics has released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crp.org/pressreleases/2006/PostElection.11.8.asp&quot;&gt;its estimates &lt;/a&gt;on the cost of campaigns for the 2006 elections.  Overall, the big spenders were the big winners - among the decided House races the high spender was the winner 398 of 425 times.  Among decided Senate races, it was 22 out of 32.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/09/more-on-the-money&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/09/more-on-the-money#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">98625 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What&#039;s the Word?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/08/whats-the-word</link>
 <description>With at least 20 Voters First Pledge signers coming in as freshman members of Congress, joining 73 incumbent signers and another 14 incumbents on the record in support of Clean Elections-style public financing of campaigns (and this with several races yet undecided) we are seeing a &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2006/11/08/new-congress-has-strong-mandate-to-put-voters-first&quot;&gt;strong voter mandate&lt;/a&gt; for cleaning up Congress.  What do you think about the election results?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/08/whats-the-word&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/08/whats-the-word#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/voters-first-pledge">Voters First Pledge</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">98087 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Election Aftermath</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/08/election-aftermath</link>
 <description>Even as votes are still being counted in close races around the country, speculation on reforms to counter the high-cost, special-interest dominated election process is being offered up.  Writers at both the &lt;em&gt;Chicago Sun-Times&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Winston-Salem Journal&lt;/em&gt; cite the Voters First Pledge, its principles and signers, as showing the way forward. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/08/election-aftermath&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/08/election-aftermath#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/illinois">Illinois</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/voters-first-pledge">Voters First Pledge</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">98069 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not Your Classroom Democracy</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/03/not-your-classroom-democracy</link>
 <description>David Donnelly, our national campaigns director, writes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/11/3/135340/978&quot;&gt;over at MyDD&lt;/a&gt; about visiting his son&amp;#39;s class to talk about elections - and facing the difference between &amp;quot;classroom democracy&amp;quot; and the real power-brokering in Washington. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/03/not-your-classroom-democracy&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/11/03/not-your-classroom-democracy#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/262">scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">95632 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tom DeLay in Legal Limbo</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/21/tom-delay-in-legal-limbo</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a target=&quot;_self&quot; href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/chronicle/3734425.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Houston Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reports today that Tom DeLay continues to be in &amp;ldquo;legal limbo&amp;rdquo; that could damage him come the November elections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/21/tom-delay-in-legal-limbo&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/21/tom-delay-in-legal-limbo#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/264">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nancy Watzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5556 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DeLay&#039;s prospects down-graded</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/09/delays-prospects-down-graded</link>
 <description>       Congressional Quarterly agrees with our take.                    ... &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/09/delays-prospects-down-graded&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/09/delays-prospects-down-graded#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/nick-lampson">Nick Lampson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/264">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-campbell">tom campbell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Donnelly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1561 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My two cents about DeLay&#039;s &#039;victory&#039; yesterday</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/my-two-cents-about-delays-victory-yesterday</link>
 <description>       I know Rick wrote about this earlier, but I wanted to add my two cents...In 2004, in the general election, DeLay received 55% of the vote. Yesterday, in a low turnout, only-the-faithful-voting primary election, he got 62%, only slightly better... &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/my-two-cents-about-delays-victory-yesterday&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/my-two-cents-about-delays-victory-yesterday#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/264">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/242">vote</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/244">voting</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Donnelly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1570 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Circle The Wagons: DeLay and Lampson Will Vie For Seat</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/circle-the-wagons-delay-and-lampson-will-vie-for-seat</link>
 <description>       DeLay was able to secure the GOP nod in TX-22 (he received 62% of the vote) but not by the margin expected from a sitting incumbent in a Republican leaning district. DeLay remains as vulnerable as people have been saying he is. Cal Jillson, a ... &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/circle-the-wagons-delay-and-lampson-will-vie-for-seat&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/03/08/circle-the-wagons-delay-and-lampson-will-vie-for-seat#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/246">Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/248">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/241">elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/262">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/242">vote</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Bielke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1557 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
