<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Congress</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Donkeys and Elephants, Giving Together</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/04/23/donkeys-and-elephants-giving-together</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9809.html&quot;&gt;Today&amp;#39;s&lt;em&gt; Politico&lt;/em&gt; notes the trend &lt;/a&gt;among stalwart Republican lobbyists and ex-legislators of giving an increasing amount of money to Democrats as the &amp;quot;price of doing business&amp;quot; with a Democrat-controlled Congress.  Among those writing checks across the aisle is lobbyist and ex-Rep. Bob Livingston (R-LA), for whom apparent contradiction is the order of day: according to the article his big clients include Northrup Grumman and the Girl Scouts. Now there&amp;#39;s a merit badge opportunity.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/04/23/donkeys-and-elephants-giving-together&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/04/23/donkeys-and-elephants-giving-together#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:30:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">237105 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Signed, Sealed, Delivered</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/04/15/signed-sealed-delivered</link>
 <description>Post Office&#039;s get named after people all the time, they&#039;re just usually dead first.Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) is trying to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/14/AR2008041402648.html&quot;&gt;name a post office&lt;/a&gt; after Cyndi Taylor Krier, who just happens to be a lobbyist for financial services giant USAA. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/04/15/signed-sealed-delivered&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/04/15/signed-sealed-delivered#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lamar-smith">Lamar Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:29:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">235504 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Reform Venture</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/20/new-reform-venture</link>
 <description>Stanford law professor and noted copyright law expert Lawrence Lessig launched his new venture today,&lt;a href=&quot;http://change-congress.org/&quot;&gt; Change-Congress.org&lt;/a&gt;, designed to track the position of members of Congress on key reform issues, and put them on the record in support of things like the Fair Elections Now Act, which would publicly finance congressional campaigns.  Read more about his project&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-lessig/fix-congress-first_b_92456.html&quot;&gt; here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/20/new-reform-venture&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/20/new-reform-venture#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/change-congress">Change-Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/reform">reform</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:43:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">230599 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One Bad Egg Rots the Whole Pork Barrel</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/14/one-bad-egg-rots-the-whole-pork-barrel</link>
 <description>The push to eliminate earmark spending for a one year period &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/one-year-earmark-moratorium-fails-in-senate-2008-03-13.html&quot;&gt;failed spectacularly&lt;/a&gt; in the Senate yesterday, despite support from unlikely corners.  Indeed stories of bribed legislators and Bridges to Nowhere weren&amp;#39;t enough to dissuade Senators from the pork barrel spending that&amp;#39;s the bread and butter of reelection.  While the impetus behind the proposed moratorium was a good one, it&amp;#39;s going at the problem the wrong way.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/14/one-bad-egg-rots-the-whole-pork-barrel&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/14/one-bad-egg-rots-the-whole-pork-barrel#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/reform">reform</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:40:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">229470 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Outsider Ethics</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/13/outsider-ethics</link>
 <description>In a move both symbolically significant and indicative of a grudging willingness to change, the House of Representatives has voted to create an independent ethics office composed of six nonpartisan officials tasked with fielding ethics allegations and reporting out to the public on what allegations have merit.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/13/outsider-ethics&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/13/outsider-ethics#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:31:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">229290 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Change for Congress</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/04/change-for-congress</link>
 <description>Lawrence Lessig, a law professor at Stanford who has spent much of his career focused on copyright law is taking up the cause of cleaning up Congress.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2008/3/4/lawProfLessigToLaunchNewInitiative&quot;&gt;His new project, change-congress.org &lt;/a&gt;will track the positions of congressional candidates in this year&amp;#39;s elections on a number of reform proposals and allow people to direct donations to candidates based on their support for these proposals.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/04/change-for-congress&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/04/change-for-congress#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:49:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">227594 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Porky Politics</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/03/porky-politics</link>
 <description>March 1st may be the first hint that spring is soon upon us, with barbecue and bikini season soon to follow, but for Congress &amp;#39;tis the season to raise big money -- coincidentally right about the time earmark requests come due.  &lt;em&gt;Roll Call&lt;/em&gt; asks around about connections, real or implied, between late-night fundraisers and daytime spending decisions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_101/news/22336-1.html&quot;&gt;(sub. req. to read whole article).&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/03/porky-politics&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/03/porky-politics#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:59:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">227447 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Subcommittee Of His Peers</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/subcommittee-of-his-peers</link>
 <description>On the heels of Rep. Rick Renzi&amp;#39;s (R-AZ) &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2008/02/22/renzi-indictment-frenzy&quot;&gt;indictment on 35 counts &lt;/a&gt;of conspiracy, fraud, money-laundering and much else the House has formed an ethics subcommittee &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,333668,00.html&quot;&gt;to conduct its own investigation&lt;/a&gt; of the Congressman&amp;#39;s dealings.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/subcommittee-of-his-peers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/subcommittee-of-his-peers#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/rick-renzi">Rick Renzi</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:06:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">226885 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Catch Up, Senate</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/catch-up-senate</link>
 <description>The Senate has some &amp;#39;splaining to do for lagging behind their counterparts in the House on two important ethics bills.  The&lt;em&gt; New York Times &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/opinion/29fri4.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=opinion&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;chides them for dragging their heels.&lt;/a&gt;  While the House has voted in favor of banning the use of campaign contributions to pay spouses of House candidates, and files campaign finance disclosure reports electronically the Senate has approved neither of these simple, sensible reforms.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/catch-up-senate&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/catch-up-senate#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/disclosure">disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:19:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">226868 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Quid Pro Faux Pas</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/28/quid-pro-faux-pas</link>
 <description>Support for spying just doesn&amp;#39;t pay like it used to. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/todays_must_read_285.php&quot;&gt;Paul Kiel at &lt;em&gt;TPM Muckrake&lt;/em&gt;r notes&lt;/a&gt; that for all that several Republican members of Congress have done to protect telecommunications companies from paying the price for their role in the warrantless wiretapping brouhaha the telecoms aren&amp;#39;t giving enough money to their campaigns.  Outrageous!  Don&amp;#39;t they know how Washington works?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/28/quid-pro-faux-pas&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/28/quid-pro-faux-pas#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/telecommunications">telecommunications</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:30:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">226681 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
