<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - public campaign</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/291/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Video Climbing the Charts</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/08/video-climbing-the-charts</link>
 <description>Front page on the Huffington Post right now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-watzman/a-question-for-you-mrm_b_71634.html&quot;&gt;is this piece&lt;/a&gt; by Public Campaign&amp;#39;s Nancy Watzman about the video question on Fair and Clean Elections which we posted to &lt;em&gt;10Questions &lt;/em&gt;and which is steadily climbing the list. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-watzman/a-question-for-you-mrm_b_71634.html&quot;&gt;Click through&lt;/a&gt; to view the video and give it a thumbs up -- the more votes we get the better our chances of getting our presidential candidates on record in support of Fair Elections.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/08/video-climbing-the-charts&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/08/video-climbing-the-charts#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections">fair elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">205881 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Return to Bundler</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/06/return-to-bundler</link>
 <description>Bundling goes beyond the Beltway.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/27A3F1A6B7BE703C8625738B0016C539?OpenDocument&quot;&gt;This story &lt;/a&gt;in the &lt;em&gt;St. Louis Post-Dispatch&lt;/em&gt;, which features commentary from Public Campaign&amp;#39;s Nick Nyhart looks at the end run around contribution limits by one very wealthy supporter of St. Louis mayor Francis Slay.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/06/return-to-bundler&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/06/return-to-bundler#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/bundling">bundling</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/missouri">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/st-louis">St. Louis</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">205514 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Knowing Who&#039;s  In Your Tent</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/25/knowing-whos-in-your-tent</link>
 <description>An Illinois pension scandal that touched Barack Obama via a political supporter of his may also touch Hillary Clinton&amp;#39;s presidential campaign as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/06/25/politics/p120922D07.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics&quot;&gt;this AP story reveals&lt;/a&gt;. The article quotes Public Campaign&amp;#39;s David Donnelly on the liability candidates face by having to recruit big donors who may have backgrounds that can cast aspersion on the campaign.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/25/knowing-whos-in-your-tent&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/25/knowing-whos-in-your-tent#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-donors">campaign donors</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fundraising">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">179994 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tough Spot</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/tough-spot</link>
 <description>Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama pledged he wouldn&amp;#39;t take money from federal lobbyists in his bid for the White House, a promise that puts him in a tough spot:&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sen.-obama-finesses-his-lobbyist-ties-2007-04-19.html&quot;&gt; just who qualifies as a lobbyist, and what qualifies as lobbyist money?&lt;/a&gt; Moreover, with the fundraising wars just beginning, how do you mount a serious campaign for the Presidency while promising to change the system?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/tough-spot&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/tough-spot#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fundraising">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">156910 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Williams and Williams</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/16/williams-and-williams</link>
 <description>Support for full public financing of elections comes from quite different parts of the blogosphere today: first, Armstrong Williams &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/ArmstrongWilliams/2007/04/16/the_new_arms_race_money&quot;&gt;writing on &lt;em&gt;Townhall&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; argues &amp;quot;Clean campaigns will reduce the power of elites by ending the new arms race for money, and bring back the soul of democracy by increasing the power of the people.&amp;quot; Byron Williams, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/byron-williams/an-attempt-to-bring-integ_b_45974.html&quot;&gt;his piece on &lt;em&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/em&gt;,&lt;/a&gt; focuses on the Fair Elections Now Act, and how it can make public financing a reality in Congress.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/16/williams-and-williams&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/16/williams-and-williams#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">155123 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bundled Up</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/16/bundled-up</link>
 <description>William Safire used his &lt;em&gt;New York Times Magazine &lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot;On Language&amp;quot; column on Sunday to&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/15/magazine/15wwlnsafire.t.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ref=magazine&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt; trace the evolution of the word &amp;quot;bundling&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; all the way from Dutch teenagers to George Bush, citing Public Campaign&amp;#39;s Rick Bielke on the first use of the term to refer to the practice of skirting campaign contribution limits by getting big donors to solicit money from friends and associates for their candidate of choice.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/16/bundled-up&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/16/bundled-up#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/bundling">bundling</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">155039 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s The Bill That They Adore</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/27/its-the-bill-that-they-adore</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The Post-Tribune&lt;/em&gt; in Gary, Indiana joins the growing list of newspapers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.post-trib.com/news/opinion/313594,edit.article&quot;&gt;expressing support&lt;/a&gt; for the Fair Elections Now Act introduced last week in the Senate.  They conclude that by raising the profile of voters in elections and reducing the influence of special interest money: &amp;quot;The proposal would go a long way toward eliminating the Jack Abramoffs of the world and take the constraints off congressmen who feel indebted to their financiers.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/27/its-the-bill-that-they-adore&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/27/its-the-bill-that-they-adore#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/indiana">indiana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">147586 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Coverage on Bill&#039;s Introduction</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/21/more-coverage-on-bills-introduction</link>
 <description>Homestate newspapers of both Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) covered their introduction of the Fair Elections Now Act yesterday.  &lt;em&gt;The Chicago Tribune&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-070320elect,1,1897182.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; focuses on Senator Durbin&amp;#39;s interest in reigning in out of control campaign spending, while the &lt;em&gt;Pittsburgh Post-Gazette&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07080/771121-84.stm&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt; Senator Specter&amp;#39;s interest in letting elected officials step off the fundraising treadmill and devote more time to doing their jobs. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/21/more-coverage-on-bills-introduction&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/21/more-coverage-on-bills-introduction#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/arlen-specter">Arlen Specter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/richard-durbin">Richard Durbin</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">145424 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Who, What, and Why</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/15/the-who-what-and-why</link>
 <description>What are we really fighting for when we embark on campaign finance reform?  Mark Schmitt, of the New American Foundation and &lt;a href=&quot;http://markschmitt.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;The Decembrist&lt;/a&gt;, opens an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/mar/14/a_fresh_start_for_campaign_reform&quot;&gt;engaging dialogue&lt;/a&gt; on TPM Cafe urging reform-minded folks to not get bogged down in the details of campaign finance and to keep our eyes on the ball: using policy (like Clean Elections) to create opportunities for more people to become involved in politics and spark social change. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/15/the-who-what-and-why&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/15/the-who-what-and-why#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance-reform">campaign finance reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/full-public-financing">full public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">143148 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Work for What Works</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/26/work-for-what-works</link>
 <description>You may be familiar with the work of Jim Hightower, a writer, commentator and co-editor of &lt;em&gt;The Hightower Lowdown. &lt;/em&gt;Hightower is a longtime proponent of Clean Elections, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/story/48405/&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; featured on AlterNet he paints a vivid contrast between the pay-to-play political culture of Washington, DC and the voter-driven politics of empowerment working in cities and states with Clean Elections.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/26/work-for-what-works&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/26/work-for-what-works#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/maine">maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign">public campaign</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">136832 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
