<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - John Doolittle</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/314/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Dear John</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/10/dear-john</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear John,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080110/ap_on_go_co/doolittle&quot;&gt;over between us.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Love,&lt;br /&gt;Congress &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/10/dear-john&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/10/dear-john#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jack-abramoff">Jack Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:28:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">217239 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Doolittle Done?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/20/doolittle-done</link>
 <description>Is scandal-plagued Congressman John Doolittle (R-CA) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30486&quot;&gt;on his way out?&lt;/a&gt;  Speculation is rampant that he&amp;#39;s soon to announce his retirement and hand the reigns over to former state Sen. Rico Oller.  Doolitte, who barely survived re-election in 2006 amid allegations about his ties to lobbyist Jack Abramoff, is facing money and polling woes going into his 2008 rematch against Democrat Charlie Brown. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/20/doolittle-done&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/20/doolittle-done#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jack-abramoff">Jack Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:13:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">208048 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Same Mistake Twice</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/16/same-mistake-twice</link>
 <description>From the Department of &lt;em&gt;Will They Never Learn? &lt;/em&gt;we get this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/15/politics/politico/thecrypt/main3370739.shtml&quot;&gt;little item:&lt;/a&gt; Rep. John Doolittle has disclosed $45,000 in payments to his wife, Julie, in the last quarter for &amp;quot;fundraising work.&amp;quot; Incidentally, Doolittle&amp;#39;s fundraising has faltered recently due to the investigation surrounding his relationship with lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and his fundraising activities -- including the commission system he worked out with his wife.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/16/same-mistake-twice&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/16/same-mistake-twice#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fundraising">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">201531 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wilkes&#039; 13</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/wilkes-13</link>
 <description>Pity the process server: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Thirteen_House_members_subpoenaed_by_man_0918.html&quot;&gt;thirteen House members were subpoenaed &lt;/a&gt;today in connection with the trial of defense contractor Brent Wilkes (the same gentleman whose bribes helped put former Rep. Duke Cunningham behind bars).  Several names on the list of thirteen, who are teaming up to fight the subpoena, will be familiar to regular readers of this page.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/wilkes-13&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/wilkes-13#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/brent-wilkes">Brent Wilkes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/262">scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:00:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">196172 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Today&#039;s Scandal Box Scores</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/01/todays-scandal-box-scores</link>
 <description>It&amp;#39;s tough being a sitting member of Congress under investigation. Nobody &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/no-contributions-yet-for-doolittles-defense-fund-2007-07-31.html&quot;&gt;donates to your legal defense fund&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;em&gt;The Politico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0707/5195.html&quot;&gt; makes Incredible Hulk jokes&lt;/a&gt; at your expense. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/01/todays-scandal-box-scores&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/01/todays-scandal-box-scores#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ted-stevens">Ted Stevens</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:18:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">186963 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Follow the Doolittle</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/27/follow-the-doolittle</link>
 <description>Aw, it&amp;#39;s sad when an ethically-challenged member of Congress can barely muster up the energy to proclaim his questionable innocence.  Rep. John Doolittle&amp;#39;s date with indictment destiny draws near, and while his feet are currently closest to the fire, he&amp;#39;s by no means alone among his congressional brethren when it comes to fearing the FBI&amp;#39;s knock on the door, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/27/washington/27inquire.html?_r=3&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;this &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; article&lt;/a&gt; explains. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/27/follow-the-doolittle&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/27/follow-the-doolittle#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:44:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">186072 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Friends in Low Places</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/07/friends-in-low-places</link>
 <description>Indicted Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) may find himself short on congressional allies these days but maybe he can call up Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) for some tea and sympathy -- yesterday scandal-plagued Doolittle&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/208831.html&quot;&gt; voted against holding House hearings &lt;/a&gt;on indicted Members in a move I&amp;#39;d never be so cynical as to suggest was calculated to keep his own goose from being cooked.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/07/friends-in-low-places&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/07/friends-in-low-places#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/william-jefferson">William Jefferson</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:43:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">175013 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Abramoff Inquiry Knocks on White House Door</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/06/abramoff-inquiry-knocks-on-white-house-door</link>
 <description>Jack Abramoff must be singing the song that never ends.  The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/05/ap3791819.html&quot;&gt;expanding its investigation&lt;/a&gt; of the relationship between the convicted lobbyist and the White House.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/06/abramoff-inquiry-knocks-on-white-house-door&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/06/abramoff-inquiry-knocks-on-white-house-door#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jack-abramoff">Jack Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/white-house">White House</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:45:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">174558 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dark Marks?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/26/dark-marks</link>
 <description>Congressional earmarks -- those add-ons to spending bills directed by individual Members -- have been the object of scrutiny as of late, and no wonder: Congress made over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-04-25-earmarks-inside_N.htm&quot;&gt;$5 billion worth in 2005 alone&lt;/a&gt;.   Do you believe Duke Cunningham was the only one who used earmarks for personal gain?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/26/dark-marks&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/26/dark-marks#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">159282 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Doolittle Steps Down from Appropriations</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/doolittle-steps-down-from-appropriations</link>
 <description>Following the FBI search of his home, signaling the next level in the investigation of both him and his wife for their ties to Jack Abramoff, Rep. John Doolittle has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-doolittle20apr20,1,474080.story?track=crosspromo&amp;amp;coll=la-news-politics-national&amp;amp;ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true&quot;&gt;stepped down &lt;/a&gt;from his seat on the powerful House Appropriations Committee.  It was from this seat, incidentally, that Doolittle helped direct millions earmarks towards defense contractor Brent Wilkes (central figure in the Duke Cunningham bribery investigation).&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/doolittle-steps-down-from-appropriations&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/doolittle-steps-down-from-appropriations#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jack-abramoff">Jack Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:19:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">156892 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
