<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - north carolina</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/316/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>All Along the Hightower</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/02/all-along-the-hightower</link>
 <description>Author and columnist Jim Hightower is always quick to voice his support for public financing of campaigns, as well as for the work of Public Campaign and Public Campaign Action Fund so its nice to be able to return the favor by directing your attention to&lt;a href=&quot;http://citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200880530094&quot;&gt; this profile of him in the &lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200880530094&quot;&gt;Asheville Citizen-Times&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/02/all-along-the-hightower&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/02/all-along-the-hightower#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jim-hightower">Jim Hightower</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:04:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">244542 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Promising Developments in North Carolina</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/10/promising-developments-in-north-carolina</link>
 <description>The &lt;em&gt;Winston-Salem Journal&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_ColumnistArticle&amp;amp;c=MGArticle&amp;amp;cid=1173354859527&amp;amp;path=%2Fopinion&quot;&gt;is encouraged by the prospects&lt;/a&gt; for the expanded public financing program for North Carolina elections, which covers candidates for the Appellate and Supreme Courts and now candidates for three of the Council of State positions (the Governor&amp;#39;s cabinet).  Six of the eleven candidates for these three positions this year intend to run with public financing.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/10/promising-developments-in-north-carolina&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/10/promising-developments-in-north-carolina#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/voter-owned-elections">Voter Owned Elections</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:39:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">228751 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Speech in Question</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/02/the-speech-in-question</link>
 <description>North Carolina was the first state to pass a law offering an option for state judicial candidates to seek office using a full public financing system.  Participation in the program has been high and public response has been sufficient to advance campaigns to offer a full public financing option for other races in the state.  But a group is challenging North Carolina&amp;#39;s law with the dubious &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot; argument which a group of judges says misses the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/columns/story/852448.html&quot;&gt;entire point of the program.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/02/the-speech-in-question&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/02/the-speech-in-question#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:03:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">215715 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Having the Option</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/01/having-the-option</link>
 <description>North Carolina faces an unusual problem with its ten Council of State positions. In addition to having a very high number of these regulatory positions chosen by election, low levels of voter interest in their elections means that campaign support comes largely from industries and interests that serve to benefit directly from Council of State decisions.  A pilot project of full public financing will be tried out next year for three of the positions, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&amp;amp;c=MGArticle&amp;amp;cid=1173352940798&amp;amp;path=!localnews&amp;amp;s=1037645509099&quot;&gt;but will it be a big enough test?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/01/having-the-option&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/01/having-the-option#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/council-of-state">Council of State</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:56:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">198623 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>North Carolina Bill Passes Senate</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/02/north-carolina-bill-passes-senate</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Woo-Hoo! The North Carolina Senate followed in the House&amp;#39;s footsteps and approved the Voter-Owned Elections public financing pilot program for three Council of State races, state auditor, insurance commissioner and superintendent of public instruction. Next the bill will go to the Governor and we&amp;#39;re optimistic he will sign it. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charlotte.com/204/story/221436.html&quot;&gt; Read more &lt;/a&gt;from the&lt;em&gt; Charlotte Observer!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/02/north-carolina-bill-passes-senate&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/02/north-carolina-bill-passes-senate#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:49:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">187191 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>North Carolina House Passes Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/30/north-carolina-house-passes-bill</link>
 <description>Thanks to everyone who made calls to their legislators in support of North Carolina&amp;#39;s public financing pilot program for Council of State races. This weekend, the state House&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/653237.html&quot;&gt; passed the program on a vote of 59-57&lt;/a&gt;. From here the bill goes to the Senate. The pilot program covers the races for state auditor, superintendent of public instruction and insurance commissioner. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/30/north-carolina-house-passes-bill&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/30/north-carolina-house-passes-bill#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/voter-owned-elections-0">Voter-Owned Elections</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:48:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">186572 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>North Carolina Needs You!</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/25/north-carolina-needs-you</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow, the North Carolina House of Representatives will vote on HB 1517, the Voter Owned Elections pilot project for Council of State Races. If you&#039;re from North Carolina, call your representative at (919) 733-4111.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/25/north-carolina-needs-you&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/25/north-carolina-needs-you#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/voter-owned-elections">Voter Owned Elections</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:03:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">185676 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wright Goes Wrong</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/17/wright-goes-wrong</link>
 <description>Hmmm,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/574895.html&quot;&gt; something&amp;#39;s brewing &lt;/a&gt;in North Carolina.  Looks like Rep. Thomas Wright (D) is being investigated for misusing campaign contributions -- failing to report over $200K between 2000 and 2006 -- and some officials and campaign finance groups are calling for his resignation.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/17/wright-goes-wrong&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/17/wright-goes-wrong#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:42:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">167133 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Follow the Money, Then Get Rid of It</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/16/follow-the-money-then-get-rid-of-it</link>
 <description>The &lt;em&gt;Raleigh News and Observer &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/579/story/553903.html&quot;&gt;profiles&lt;/a&gt; the latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracy-nc.org/moneyresearch/2007/LobbyPrincipal.pdf&quot;&gt;report &lt;/a&gt;(pdf) by Democracy North Carolina on the nearly $15 million in fees paid to lobbyists in 2005 -- that&amp;#39;s a lot of influence bought and sold at the Capitol building, and a good example of the perfectly legal but questionable activity that happens in a pay-to-play political system.  Luckily Democracy North Carolina is on the case, pushing to curb the influence of money in politics by creating full public financing of campaigns.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/16/follow-the-money-then-get-rid-of-it&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/16/follow-the-money-then-get-rid-of-it#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/full-public-financing">full public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/report">report</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/voter-owned-elections">Voter Owned Elections</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:17:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">143709 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Work of Clean Elections: Interview with Adam Sotak</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/07/the-work-of-clean-elections-interview-with-adam-sotak</link>
 <description>Yesterday I had the opportunity to talk with one of the organizers at the forefront of the work to win full public financing of elections in North Carolina.  Organizing Director Adam Sotak has been with Democracy North Carolina since 2000, and talked with me about the history of the work in North Carolina, and what 2007 has in store. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/07/the-work-of-clean-elections-interview-with-adam-sotak&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/07/the-work-of-clean-elections-interview-with-adam-sotak#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/democracy-north-carolina">Democracy North Carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:24:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140260 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
