<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - california</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/334/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Perata Pro Quo?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/21/perata-pro-quo</link>
 <description>Did California state Senator Don Perata (D) push officials in Oakland to hire a lobbyist who would push for the pet project of a major contributor to Perata?  The FBI is investigating what may have been quite an elaborate instance of quid pro quo which the&lt;em&gt; San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt; sums up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/20/MNFA11RNMU.DTL&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/21/perata-pro-quo&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/21/perata-pro-quo#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/don-perata">Don Perata</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">253995 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Much for a Name?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/05/how-much-for-a-name</link>
 <description>Christopher Moylan, a city councilman from Sunnyvale California &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_7366797?nclick_check=1&quot;&gt;writes this op-ed&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/em&gt; encouraging a public financing option for municipal campaigns to encourage a more diverse field of candidates and surmount the cost barrier to running for office.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/05/how-much-for-a-name&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/05/how-much-for-a-name#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">205330 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dirty Laundry</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/24/dirty-laundry</link>
 <description>How do you circumvent donation limits and exploit a matching donation program to boot?  Ask the real estate developers who &amp;quot;launder&amp;quot; contributions to the Los Angeles mayor and city council as explored &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knbc.com/news/14176729/detail.html&quot;&gt;this report&lt;/a&gt; by the local NBC affiliate (transcript and video available). &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/24/dirty-laundry&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/24/dirty-laundry#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fundraising">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/los-angeles">Los Angeles</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">197269 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bottom of the Heap</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/bottom-of-the-heap</link>
 <description>Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has released its list of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensforethics.com/node/30138&quot;&gt;22 most corrupt members of Congress&lt;/a&gt;.  The third annual iteration of this report, called &amp;quot;Beyond DeLay&amp;quot; includes scandal summaries for each of the 22 members cited (and two more to watch out for). California leads the tally with five members listed but Alaska enjoys the distinction of having its entire congressional delegation on the list.  Perhaps they&amp;#39;ll get jackets made. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/bottom-of-the-heap&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/bottom-of-the-heap#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/alaska">Alaska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">196189 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bad Language</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/10/bad-language</link>
 <description>Susan Lerner of the California Clean Money Campaign rightly criticizes the biased ballot language that Sunnyvale, CA city councilors have used to frame the issue of bringing full public financing of elections to the city, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_6338629&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; by Julie Patel at the&lt;em&gt; San Jose Mercury News. &lt;em&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/10/bad-language&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/10/bad-language#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/full-public-financing">full public financing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">182791 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Another Chance for California</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/03/another-chance-for-california</link>
 <description>Trent Lange of the California Clean Money Action Fund writes at &lt;em&gt;California Progress Report&lt;/em&gt; about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/05/clean_money_wil.html&quot;&gt;resurgence&lt;/a&gt; of AB 583, the California Clean Elections bill sponsored by Assemblymember Loni Hancock which has passed through the Assembly Elections Committee and will now to the Appropriations Committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/03/another-chance-for-california&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/03/another-chance-for-california#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ab-583">AB 583</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/loni-hancock">Loni Hancock</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">162012 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Healthy Dose of Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/23/healthy-dose-of-reform</link>
 <description>Deborah Burger, President of the California Nurses Association, knows as well as anyone the effects our current campaign finance system has on health care policy: while HMOs write checks up and down Capitol Hill, we watch insurance premiums spike and affordable health care move further and further out of the grasp of ordinary people.  That&amp;#39;s why she&amp;#39;s excited by what the Fair Elections Now Act &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deborah-burger/clean-money-bill-would-he_b_44042.html&quot;&gt;could mean for comprehensive healthcare reform.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/23/healthy-dose-of-reform&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/03/23/healthy-dose-of-reform#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/healthcare">healthcare</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">146304 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Voting Class</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/01/29/the-voting-class</link>
 <description>Steven Hill &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/01/28/INGGPNPCMI1.DTL&quot;&gt;writes in &lt;em&gt;The San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;about growing voter disenfranchisement and apathy in California and what can be done about it.  In doing so, he says efforts to win full public financing should be abandoned - pointing to the loss of Proposition 89, the Clean Elections ballot initiative, in 2006.  But if most eligible adults aren&amp;#39;t voting, can you point to an electoral loss as evidence against pursuing full public financing?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/01/29/the-voting-class&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/01/29/the-voting-class#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/full-public-financing">full public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/proposition-89">Proposition 89</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">127193 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Traveler Tales</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/22/traveler-tales</link>
 <description>Doug Heller, of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/16293759.htm&quot;&gt;questioning the ethics&lt;/a&gt; of a two-week trip for a group of California lawmakers financed by the California Foundation on the Environment and the Economy. comparing it to Jack Abramoff&amp;#39;s infamous Scotland golfing junket. Though billed as educational in purpose, the trip to Brazil included stays at luxury hotels and side trips to tourist destinations.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/22/traveler-tales&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/22/traveler-tales#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/influence">influence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbying">lobbying</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">113554 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Trouble for Doolittle</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/12/more-trouble-for-doolittle</link>
 <description>Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) who narrowly won re-election last month amid growing allegations of his ties to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, is writing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sierrasun.com/article/20061211/NEWS/61210009/-1/rss01&quot;&gt;lot of checks&lt;/a&gt; to a law firm that handles campaign finance cases - $44,138 in all, and probably not the last of it. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/12/more-trouble-for-doolittle&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/12/more-trouble-for-doolittle#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jack-abramoff">Jack Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109963 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
