<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - duke cunningham</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/370/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Pay Up</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/01/pay-up</link>
 <description>Mitchell Wade, the contractor for MZM inc. implicated in the Duke Cunningham bribery scandal, has been ordered by the FEC to pay &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/31/politics/politico/thecrypt/main3437987.shtml&quot;&gt;a $1,000,000 fine&lt;/a&gt; for funneling tens of thousands in illegal campaign donations to Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) and former Rep. Katherine Harris (R-FL).&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/01/pay-up&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/01/pay-up#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitchell-wade">Mitchell Wade</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:06:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">204573 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wilkes&#039; 13</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/wilkes-13</link>
 <description>Pity the process server: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Thirteen_House_members_subpoenaed_by_man_0918.html&quot;&gt;thirteen House members were subpoenaed &lt;/a&gt;today in connection with the trial of defense contractor Brent Wilkes (the same gentleman whose bribes helped put former Rep. Duke Cunningham behind bars).  Several names on the list of thirteen, who are teaming up to fight the subpoena, will be familiar to regular readers of this page.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/wilkes-13&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/18/wilkes-13#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/brent-wilkes">Brent Wilkes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/262">scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:00:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">196172 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dark Marks?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/26/dark-marks</link>
 <description>Congressional earmarks -- those add-ons to spending bills directed by individual Members -- have been the object of scrutiny as of late, and no wonder: Congress made over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-04-25-earmarks-inside_N.htm&quot;&gt;$5 billion worth in 2005 alone&lt;/a&gt;.   Do you believe Duke Cunningham was the only one who used earmarks for personal gain?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/26/dark-marks&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/26/dark-marks#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">159282 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Doolittle Steps Down from Appropriations</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/doolittle-steps-down-from-appropriations</link>
 <description>Following the FBI search of his home, signaling the next level in the investigation of both him and his wife for their ties to Jack Abramoff, Rep. John Doolittle has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-doolittle20apr20,1,474080.story?track=crosspromo&amp;amp;coll=la-news-politics-national&amp;amp;ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true&quot;&gt;stepped down &lt;/a&gt;from his seat on the powerful House Appropriations Committee.  It was from this seat, incidentally, that Doolittle helped direct millions earmarks towards defense contractor Brent Wilkes (central figure in the Duke Cunningham bribery investigation).&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/doolittle-steps-down-from-appropriations&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/20/doolittle-steps-down-from-appropriations#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jack-abramoff">Jack Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-doolittle">John Doolittle</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:19:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">156892 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>From the Gift Horse&#039;s Mouth</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/08/07/from-the-gift-horses-mouth</link>
 <description>Brent Wilkes, the defense contractor implicated in the Duke Cunningham bribery scandal and possibly in the developing investigation of Rep. Jerry Lewis, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/washington/06wilkes.html?pagewanted=1&amp;amp;_r=1&amp;amp;ei=5094&amp;amp;en=b811f7519279d9b2&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;ex=1154836800&amp;amp;partner=homepage&quot;&gt;talks to&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; about his lucrative career trading campaign cash for earmarks - or what he calls &amp;quot;transactional lobbying.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/08/07/from-the-gift-horses-mouth&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/08/07/from-the-gift-horses-mouth#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 10:11:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">58431 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Earmark &quot;Virus&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/25/the-earmark-virus</link>
 <description>Conressional earmarking is a $30 billion a year business and while lawmakers claim the spending goes to benefit their districts, it also has a funny way of benefitting major campaign donors. The Christian Science Monitor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0725/p02s01-uspo.html&quot;&gt;looks at the growing controversy&lt;/a&gt; around it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/25/the-earmark-virus&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/25/the-earmark-virus#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/dennis-hastert">Dennis Hastert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarking">earmarking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:39:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53591 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bribery:  A Growth Industry</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/06/bribery-a-growth-industry</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;Vanity Fair&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/articles/060705fege01&quot;&gt;profiles the sordid tale&lt;/a&gt; of ex-congressman Randy &amp;quot;Duke&amp;quot; Cunningham and the defense contractors, Brent Wilkes and Mitchell Wade, who made a business out of bribing him. A lot of the story&amp;#39;s been told before, but this piece ties it all together to chilling effect.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/06/bribery-a-growth-industry&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/06/bribery-a-growth-industry#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/katherine-harris">katherine harris</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:05:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46294 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When First We Travel to Deceive</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/06/when-first-we-travel-to-deceive</link>
 <description>TPMmuckraker does some digging into the congressional corporate-funded travel report released yesterday, making connections between staffers for Rep. Jerry Lewis and former Rep. Duke Cunningham and the company funding the most travel.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/06/when-first-we-travel-to-deceive&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/06/when-first-we-travel-to-deceive#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:22:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35278 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Put it to a Vote</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/06/put-it-to-a-vote</link>
 <description>Today could mark the beginning of an electoral referendum on reform - three contests heading to the polls today could signal whether corruption will play a major role in this year&amp;#39;s elections. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/06/put-it-to-a-vote&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/06/put-it-to-a-vote#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/conrad-burns">Conrad Burns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/richard-pombo">Richard Pombo</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:12:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35266 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Queen of Earmarks&quot; Probed in Lewis Investigation</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/05/queen-of-earmarks-probed-in-lewis-investigation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;News broke awhile back about the FBI&amp;#39;s investigation into ties between Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) and a lobbying firm with ties to the same defense contractor involved in the Duke Cunningham scandal.  Now more key players, including ex-Lewis staffers, are coming to light.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/05/queen-of-earmarks-probed-in-lewis-investigation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/06/05/queen-of-earmarks-probed-in-lewis-investigation#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:45:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34872 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
