<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - ethics</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/382/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Outsider Ethics</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/13/outsider-ethics</link>
 <description>In a move both symbolically significant and indicative of a grudging willingness to change, the House of Representatives has voted to create an independent ethics office composed of six nonpartisan officials tasked with fielding ethics allegations and reporting out to the public on what allegations have merit.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/13/outsider-ethics&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/13/outsider-ethics#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:31:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">229290 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Catch Up, Senate</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/catch-up-senate</link>
 <description>The Senate has some &amp;#39;splaining to do for lagging behind their counterparts in the House on two important ethics bills.  The&lt;em&gt; New York Times &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/opinion/29fri4.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=opinion&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;chides them for dragging their heels.&lt;/a&gt;  While the House has voted in favor of banning the use of campaign contributions to pay spouses of House candidates, and files campaign finance disclosure reports electronically the Senate has approved neither of these simple, sensible reforms.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/catch-up-senate&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/29/catch-up-senate#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/disclosure">disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:19:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">226868 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Doughnut Dilemma</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/25/the-doughnut-dilemma</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=f032af76-1ea1-4a9e-9c73-bf5f87fa6206&quot;&gt;Here&amp;#39;s what happens&lt;/a&gt; on Capitol Hill when you change the rules but not the game: a bunch of lobbyists and their legal advisors get together to hammer out a policy on tuna sandwiches.  As new lobbying regulations go in to effect cutting into the lavish dinners and other events lobbyists had previously held to woo members of Congress, they&amp;#39;re putting their heads together to find all the loopholes.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/25/the-doughnut-dilemma&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/25/the-doughnut-dilemma#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fundraising">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbying">lobbying</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:34:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">203304 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ethics Bill Becomes Law</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/17/ethics-bill-becomes-law</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On Friday, President Bush signed into law the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 (S. 1)--one of the most sweeping ethics and lobbying reform bills in decades. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) said the bill was &quot;the most sweeping ethics reform since Watergate.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/17/ethics-bill-becomes-law&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/17/ethics-bill-becomes-law#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbying">lobbying</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:11:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">196004 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Equal Enforcement?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/06/equal-enforcement</link>
 <description>We&amp;#39;re not the only ones questioning McConnell&amp;#39;s track record today. &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/09/uneven-stevens.html&quot;&gt;is wondering&lt;/a&gt; about his...uneven...enforcement of ethics policies among his Senate Republicans.  They focus in particular on McConnell&amp;#39;s quick shunning of Sen. Larry Craig but much lighter treatment of Sen. Ted Stevens, even as the corruption probe surrounding the former heats up. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/06/equal-enforcement&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/06/equal-enforcement#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ted-stevens">Ted Stevens</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:11:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">193896 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two Steps Forward or Three Steps Back?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/09/two-steps-forward-or-three-steps-back</link>
 <description>With President Bush still mulling over whether to sign the lobbying and ethics reform bill passed by Congress, there are those who are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.morningsun.net/stories/080907/opinion_1186635692.xml.shtml&quot;&gt;lauding&lt;/a&gt; legislative efforts to thwart corruption, and those &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/business/columnists/markowitz/s_521280.html&quot;&gt;lamenting &lt;/a&gt;that those laws need to be written in the first place.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/09/two-steps-forward-or-three-steps-back&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/09/two-steps-forward-or-three-steps-back#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:31:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">188528 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jefferson Update</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/07/jefferson-update</link>
 <description>Looks like the House Ethics Committee investigation of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/08/06/william_jefferson_ethics_probe_postponed/1437/&quot;&gt;will be postponed&lt;/a&gt; until his after he heads to court in January to face indictment on 16 counts including soliciting bribes, money laundering, obstruction of justice, wire fraud, conspiracy, and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, to avoid &amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;interfering with the criminal prosecution and related ongoing investigation.&amp;quot; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/07/jefferson-update&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/08/07/jefferson-update#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/william-jefferson">William Jefferson</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:19:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">188154 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You&#039;re Not...Serious?  Are You?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/31/youre-not-serious-are-you</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0707/Stevens_threatens_to_block_lobbying_bill_.html&quot;&gt;You can&amp;#39;t make this stuff up&lt;/a&gt;: Sen. Stevens (he of the freshly raided home) is threatening to place a hold on the ethics overhaul bill j&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1648373,00.html&quot;&gt;ust passed by the House.&lt;/a&gt;  From &lt;em&gt;The Politico&lt;/em&gt;: &amp;quot;The senator told a closed session of fellow Republicans today, including Vice President Dick Cheney, that he was upset that the measure would interfere with his travel to and from Alaska – and vowed to block it.&amp;quot;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/31/youre-not-serious-are-you&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/31/youre-not-serious-are-you#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ted-stevens">Ted Stevens</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:59:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">186786 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>He Was Against It Before He Was For It</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/09/he-was-against-it-before-he-was-for-it</link>
 <description>Sen. Mitch McConnell(R-KY) is so opposed to ethics and lobbying reform he supports it.  It&amp;#39;s so right it&amp;#39;s wrong.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/09/he-was-against-it-before-he-was-for-it&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/07/09/he-was-against-it-before-he-was-for-it#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbying">lobbying</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:56:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">182595 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Please &quot;Hammer,&quot; Don&#039;t Hurt &#039;Em</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/10/please-hammer-dont-hurt-em</link>
 <description>Help, I&amp;#39;m pinned under about a ton of irony: indicted former Rep. Tom DeLay is participating in a panel discussion on &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2007/05/ethics_tips_from_the_hammer.html&quot;&gt;campaign tactics and ethics&lt;/a&gt;.  All of you aspiring to a political career marked by corrupting greed and resignation in disgrace, mark your calendars. </description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/10/please-hammer-dont-hurt-em#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:14:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">164566 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
