<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - political contributions</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/444/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Wal-Mart&#039;s Wallet</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/03/wal-marts-wallet</link>
 <description>Already the #1 corporate political contributor at the federal level, Wal-Mart is getting into the state money game in a big way - particulary in California. &lt;a href=&quot;http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/News/WalMartShoppingForLawmakers.aspx?GT1=8698&quot;&gt; This article in &lt;em&gt;BusinessWeek&lt;/em&gt; (via MSN)&lt;/a&gt; gets into what they&amp;#39;re going shopping for.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/03/wal-marts-wallet&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/03/wal-marts-wallet#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/political-contributions">political contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/proposition-89">Proposition 89</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/wal-mart">Wal-Mart</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81489 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Money Continues To Be Sent Back To Abramoff and Clients</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/01/03/money-continues-to-be-sent-back-to-abramoff-and-clients</link>
 <description>       Dozens of lawmakers are sending contributions back to Abramoff and his clients in hopes of removing any links between the two. Two of the latest to give money back are from the Big Sky State: Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) returned $18,892 for using a... &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/01/03/money-continues-to-be-sent-back-to-abramoff-and-clients&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/01/03/money-continues-to-be-sent-back-to-abramoff-and-clients#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/246">Abramoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/265">corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/montana">Montana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/political-contributions">political contributions</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Bielke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">986 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Buying bad publicity</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2005/11/10/buying-bad-publicity</link>
 <description>       A story on Law.com sheds a little more light on the eight corporations indicted alongside DeLay and his associates in the TRMPAC case. Four have settled, four are fighting the charges. My favorite passage from the article:David Sheppard, a sol... &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2005/11/10/buying-bad-publicity&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2005/11/10/buying-bad-publicity#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/political-contributions">political contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/trmpac">TRMPAC</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Donnelly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">649 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Breaking News: Indictment Dropped Against Company In Exchange For Cooperation!</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2004/12/10/breaking-news-indictment-dropped-against-company-in-exchange-for-cooperation</link>
 <description>       The  Houston Chronicle (registration required)  reported that Travis County prosecutors have announced that charges against Diversified Collection Services, Inc., one of the eight companies indicted for making illegal political contributions t... &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2004/12/10/breaking-news-indictment-dropped-against-company-in-exchange-for-cooperation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2004/12/10/breaking-news-indictment-dropped-against-company-in-exchange-for-cooperation#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/255">Houston</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/pacs">PACs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/political-contributions">political contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-delay">Tom DeLay</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Bielke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">638 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
