<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - Dennis Hastert</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/530/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Earmark &quot;Virus&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/25/the-earmark-virus</link>
 <description>Conressional earmarking is a $30 billion a year business and while lawmakers claim the spending goes to benefit their districts, it also has a funny way of benefitting major campaign donors. The Christian Science Monitor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0725/p02s01-uspo.html&quot;&gt;looks at the growing controversy&lt;/a&gt; around it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/25/the-earmark-virus&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/25/the-earmark-virus#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/dennis-hastert">Dennis Hastert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/duke-cunningham">duke cunningham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarking">earmarking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53591 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Behind the Office Door</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/24/behind-the-office-door</link>
 <description>House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) has come to the unlikely defense of embattled Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) in the debate over the search of Jefferson&amp;#39;s office by FBI agents. Could it be that Hastert is worried he might be the subject of an investigation of his own? &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/24/behind-the-office-door&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/07/24/behind-the-office-door#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/dennis-hastert">Dennis Hastert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/william-jefferson">William Jefferson</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53154 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
