<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - earmarks</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/534/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Protecting the Young</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/05/01/protecting-the-young</link>
 <description>On the one hand, three cheers for investigations into lawmakers abusing their positions to reward themselves and their contributions, on the other hand thumbs down for recent court rulings that are deterring public corruption investigations in favor of granting special privacy privileges to members of Congress. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9999.html&quot;&gt; Go the &lt;em&gt;Politico &lt;/em&gt;for more&lt;/a&gt; on the Rep. Don Young (R-AK) earmark controversy and the Speech and Debate clause that might save him.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/05/01/protecting-the-young&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/05/01/protecting-the-young#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/alaska">Alaska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/don-young">Don Young</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:32:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">238596 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One Bad Egg Rots the Whole Pork Barrel</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/14/one-bad-egg-rots-the-whole-pork-barrel</link>
 <description>The push to eliminate earmark spending for a one year period &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/one-year-earmark-moratorium-fails-in-senate-2008-03-13.html&quot;&gt;failed spectacularly&lt;/a&gt; in the Senate yesterday, despite support from unlikely corners.  Indeed stories of bribed legislators and Bridges to Nowhere weren&amp;#39;t enough to dissuade Senators from the pork barrel spending that&amp;#39;s the bread and butter of reelection.  While the impetus behind the proposed moratorium was a good one, it&amp;#39;s going at the problem the wrong way.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/14/one-bad-egg-rots-the-whole-pork-barrel&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/14/one-bad-egg-rots-the-whole-pork-barrel#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/reform">reform</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:40:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">229470 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Porky Politics</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/03/porky-politics</link>
 <description>March 1st may be the first hint that spring is soon upon us, with barbecue and bikini season soon to follow, but for Congress &amp;#39;tis the season to raise big money -- coincidentally right about the time earmark requests come due.  &lt;em&gt;Roll Call&lt;/em&gt; asks around about connections, real or implied, between late-night fundraisers and daytime spending decisions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_101/news/22336-1.html&quot;&gt;(sub. req. to read whole article).&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/03/porky-politics&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/03/03/porky-politics#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:59:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">227447 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Marks for Earmarking</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/19/marks-for-earmarking</link>
 <description>Earmarks have been a hot topic on the Hill of late, and a go-to target for debates on wasteful government spending.  How do the major candidates for president stack up when it comes to these controversial spending allocations, the ethics around them, and what about the earmarking process should be changed? The &lt;em&gt;Post and Courier&lt;/em&gt; in Charleston, South Carolina, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/feb/17/the_candidates_earmarks30919/&quot;&gt;takes a look.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/19/marks-for-earmarking&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/19/marks-for-earmarking#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:24:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">224949 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sen. Stevens Continues to Endear Himself</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/11/sen-stevens-continues-to-endear-himself</link>
 <description>More bad news for Senator Ted Stevens.  &lt;em&gt;The Anchorage Daily News&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsminer.com/news/2008/feb/11/documents-show-stevens-earmark-led-real-estate-pur/&quot;&gt;is reporting&lt;/a&gt; that he set up an earmark to finance a real estate bailout for a longtime aid.  The $1.6 million earmark to the SeaLife Center in Seward, Alaska was used to buy half a million in property from a former aide, Trevor McCabe.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/11/sen-stevens-continues-to-endear-himself&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/11/sen-stevens-continues-to-endear-himself#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/alaska">Alaska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ted-stevens">Ted Stevens</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:11:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">223457 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Underwhelming</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/29/underwhelming</link>
 <description>In his final State of the Union address last night President Bush announced his intention to wield the veto pen against congressional earmarks but it&amp;#39;s too little, too late for the billions in secret spending that have already been doled out for pork barrel project rewards to campaign contributors. Many, including Public Campaign Action Fund&amp;#39;s David Donnelly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/01/29/watchdogs_spurn_bushs_vow_of_earmark_veto/&quot;&gt;tell the &lt;em&gt;Boston Globe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;that Bush should have gone much farther.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/29/underwhelming&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/29/underwhelming#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/george-bush">George Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign-action-fund">Public Campaign Action Fund</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:25:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">220903 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pork on Parade</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/12/04/pork-on-parade</link>
 <description>Taxpayers for Common Sense just &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sens.-cochran-stevens-lead-in-earmark-tally-2007-12-03.html&quot;&gt;came out with tallies&lt;/a&gt; for the members of Congress who&amp;#39;ve collected the most earmarks and right near the top of the list are both &lt;a href=&quot;/blog-tags/ted-stevens&quot;&gt;Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;/blog-tags/jerry-lewis&quot;&gt;Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA)&lt;/a&gt;, both of whom are in the middle of corruption investigations.   &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/12/04/pork-on-parade&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/12/04/pork-on-parade#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/jerry-lewis">Jerry Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ted-stevens">Ted Stevens</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:12:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">210478 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Earmark if You Believe in Ferries</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/15/earmark-if-you-believe-in-ferries</link>
 <description>A &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; won&amp;#39;t pass muster anymore, but a boat to nowhere?  Hey, that&amp;#39;s worth trying.  Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), perhaps attempting to distract attention from &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2007/11/12/youre-on-crooked-camera&quot;&gt;his other scandals&lt;/a&gt;, has stuck a $20 million earmark into defense spending legislation to fund a ferry that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_61/news/21027-1.html&quot;&gt;looks to benefit&lt;/a&gt; no one so much as his scandal-tainted friends and former staffers who have development interests in the area the ferry would serve (&lt;em&gt;Roll Call&lt;/em&gt;, sub req.).&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/15/earmark-if-you-believe-in-ferries&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/15/earmark-if-you-believe-in-ferries#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/alaska">Alaska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/ted-stevens">Ted Stevens</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:20:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">207108 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In One Earmark, Out the Other</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/12/in-one-earmark-out-the-other</link>
 <description>Not a good day for Rep. Don Young (R-AK) in the press.  &lt;em&gt;The Anchorage Daily News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adn.com/news/politics/fbi/young/story/9447181p-9358502c.html&quot;&gt; digs into him &lt;/a&gt;for a long history of taking generous campaign contributions from interests for whom he earmarked millions upon millions in federal money. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/12/in-one-earmark-out-the-other&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/11/12/in-one-earmark-out-the-other#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/alaska">Alaska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/don-young">Don Young</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:01:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">206613 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pinpointing the Problem</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/19/pinpointing-the-problem</link>
 <description>An article in &lt;em&gt;The Seattle Times&lt;/em&gt; on earmarks for defense spending and its correlation to campaign contributions received by Washington legislators has touched a nerve for readers and sparked &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2003957589_thulets18.html&quot;&gt;this point/counterpoint&lt;/a&gt; in the letters to the editor section about the need to address this problem via full public financing of campaigns.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/19/pinpointing-the-problem&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/19/pinpointing-the-problem#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/washington">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:36:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">202113 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
