<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - campaign finance</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/540/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>These Talking Points Need Work</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/08/12/these-talking-points-need-work</link>
 <description>Setting aside our tendency to disagree with nearly everything the Center for Competitive Politics says, it&amp;#39;s hard to take their opposition to campaign finance regulation seriously when their founder, Bradley Smith, blames the McCain-Feingold law &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12460.html&quot;&gt;for the Rep. Mark Foley scandal&lt;/a&gt;. Bradley, it wasn&amp;#39;t contribution limits Foley had trouble with it -- it was &lt;em&gt;age &lt;/em&gt;limits. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/08/12/these-talking-points-need-work&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/08/12/these-talking-points-need-work#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">258257 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It Ain&#039;t Easy Taking Green</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/31/it-aint-easy-taking-green</link>
 <description>Public Campaign Action Fund&amp;#39;s project, Campaign Money Watch, has been doing extensive &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2008/07/28/tokens-of-appreciation&quot;&gt;research into Senator John McCain&amp;#39;s (R) &lt;/a&gt;recent reversal on the offshore oil drilling ban, and what a flood of contributions from the oil industry may have had to do with it. A couple of other organizations &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/07/30/energy-issue-becomes-blue-hot/&quot;&gt;have picked up the thread &lt;/a&gt;and joined the effort to get an answer on whether campaign contributions from Big Oil are effecting McCain&amp;#39;s policy decisions.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/31/it-aint-easy-taking-green&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/31/it-aint-easy-taking-green#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/big-oil">Big Oil</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/public-campaign-action-fund">Public Campaign Action Fund</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">255992 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Comes Next</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/24/what-comes-next</link>
 <description>Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institute was a champion of the McCain-Feingold reforms, and his analysis helped get the law passed.  Now, as he explains in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=whats_next_for_campaign_finance&quot;&gt;an interview with Abby Rapoport at &lt;em&gt;The American Prospect&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, he is leaning more towards what can be done with public financing of campaigns, both fixing the presidential system and creating a Congressional system.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/24/what-comes-next&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/24/what-comes-next#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mccain-feingold">McCain-Feingold</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">254586 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Back for More</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/23/back-for-more</link>
 <description>Research done by Public Campaign Action Fund&amp;#39;s Campaign Money Watch project &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/22/bush_bundlers_raise_26_million.html&quot;&gt;has revealed &lt;/a&gt;that though the candidates in this year&amp;#39;s presidential race may be different than in years past, the big donors sure aren&amp;#39;t -- at least when it comes to the migration of President Bush&amp;#39;s best bundlers to the donor rolls of Sen. John McCain&amp;#39;s campaign. One hundred and twenty-four bundlers for Bush&amp;#39;s campaign are now bundling for McCain, and have brought in just shy of $26 million.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/23/back-for-more&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/23/back-for-more#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/bundlers">bundlers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">254353 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Money Coming In</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/22/money-coming-in</link>
 <description>We all know that candidates for the Presidency and Congress alike are making the calls to the small, elite group of donors known for writing four-figure checks in election years.  But other major avenues for political money are the independent 527 groups&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-07-21-donorinside_N.htm&quot;&gt; who can raise an unlimited amount&lt;/a&gt; of money and spend it at will, provided they follow requirements to disclose the source of that money.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/22/money-coming-in&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/22/money-coming-in#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/245">527</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">254179 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Campaign Finance Reform and the Single Girl</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/22/campaign-finance-reform-and-the-single-girl</link>
 <description>No one ever accused the campaign finance reform movement of being long on sizzle and short on substance, but there&amp;#39;s one former fundraising heavyweight who&amp;#39;s seen the political money machine from the inside and is aiming to infuse the popular perception of dialing for dollars with a little sex appeal. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/22/campaign-finance-reform-and-the-single-girl&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/22/campaign-finance-reform-and-the-single-girl#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">254177 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bagging the Bundlers</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/16/bagging-the-bundlers</link>
 <description>In these campaign contribution-limited times, the big-money bundlers to the presidential campaigns are worth their weight in gold (check or credit card also accepted).  McCain, whose Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act helped establish current federal campaign contribution limits, is out-raising Obama on the bundler front but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-07-15-bundlers_N.htm&quot;&gt;neither man is exactly eschewing the practice &lt;/a&gt;that many have called a loophole for big donor influence.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/16/bagging-the-bundlers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/16/bagging-the-bundlers#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/bundlers">bundlers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">253016 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Conventional Tactics</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/14/conventional-tactics</link>
 <description>We&amp;#39;ve noted on several occasions the major loophole provided by Democratic and Republican conventions for corporations to flex their contribution muscles. Conventions don&amp;#39;t fit under the guidelines that restrict corporate giving to candidates and parties, so the multi-million dollar events are a good opportunity for corporate interests to give generously - and reap the benefits. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/us/politics/14convention.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=politics&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;This article in the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;focuses on the Democratic convention in Denver, and its fundraising power-player, Steve Farber. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/14/conventional-tactics&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/14/conventional-tactics#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/conventions">conventions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">252580 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Making a List, Checking it Twice</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/11/making-a-list-checking-it-twice</link>
 <description>Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) values his reputation as a reformer and Sen. Barack Obama (D) has boasted about the transparency of his campaign but the &lt;em&gt;New York Times &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/us/politics/11bundlers.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;is a little disappointed&lt;/a&gt; in both of their efforts on the donor/bundler disclosure front.  After a nudge from the paper the Obama campaign updated its publicly available list of bundlers but should they need hounding from the press?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/11/making-a-list-checking-it-twice&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/11/making-a-list-checking-it-twice#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">252043 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oh, We&#039;re Dead.  You Hadn&#039;t Heard?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/08/oh-were-dead-you-hadnt-heard</link>
 <description>I had no more than a passing relationship with science classes in college but I stuck around long enough to absorb the following: &amp;quot;the plural of anecdote is not data.&amp;quot; I don&amp;#39;t want to come down too hard on Jim Mills at &lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;, but I think he&amp;#39;d do well to refer to this little aphorism before he picks up his hammer again &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/jim-mills/rip-campaign-finance-reform-2008-07-07.html&quot;&gt;to drive a stake into the heart &lt;/a&gt;of campaign finance reform. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/08/oh-were-dead-you-hadnt-heard&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/07/08/oh-were-dead-you-hadnt-heard#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">251442 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
