<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - transparency</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/584/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Marks for Earmarking</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/19/marks-for-earmarking</link>
 <description>Earmarks have been a hot topic on the Hill of late, and a go-to target for debates on wasteful government spending.  How do the major candidates for president stack up when it comes to these controversial spending allocations, the ethics around them, and what about the earmarking process should be changed? The &lt;em&gt;Post and Courier&lt;/em&gt; in Charleston, South Carolina, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/feb/17/the_candidates_earmarks30919/&quot;&gt;takes a look.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/19/marks-for-earmarking&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/02/19/marks-for-earmarking#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/earmarks">earmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:24:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">224949 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Accountability in Albany</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/12/06/accountability-in-albany</link>
 <description>The &lt;em&gt;Rochester Democrat and Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071206/OPINION04/712060339/1041/OPINION&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;isn&amp;#39;t pleased&lt;/a&gt; that the high cost of campaigning and resultant concentration of power among the small percentage of the population who can make significant campaign contributions.  The paper urges Eliot Spitzer to continue in his efforts at a more transparent government, and to support Clean Elections public financing for state races.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/12/06/accountability-in-albany&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/12/06/accountability-in-albany#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/new-york">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:23:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">210871 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Puppet Obstruction</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/27/puppet-obstruction</link>
 <description>Did Sen. McConnell send Sen. Ensign &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/ensign_amendment_actually_a_mcconnell_amendment&quot;&gt;to do his dirty work&lt;/a&gt;?  The Senate has been battling over S. 223, the bill that would require electronic filing of campaign finance reports by Senators (the House already does this).  Turns out the efforts to obstruct the bill may have been coming from Sen. McConnell&amp;#39;s office the whole time.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/27/puppet-obstruction&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/27/puppet-obstruction#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/john-ensign">John Ensign</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:31:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">197786 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Strange Contrast</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/11/strange-contrast</link>
 <description>Interesting development: Kentucky state Sen. Damon Thayer (R) has introduced a bill to increase the frequency of campaign finance disclosure reports that candidates must submit in an effort to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070911/NEWS01/709110370/1008/NEWS01&quot;&gt;boost transparency of campaign finances&lt;/a&gt;.  Incidentally, Thayer is the same Senator who worked to get rid of the public financing program for gubernatorial campaigns that Kentucky had.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/11/strange-contrast&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/09/11/strange-contrast#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/kentucky">Kentucky</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:35:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">194847 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tricky Mitch</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/27/tricky-mitch</link>
 <description>Remember Senator Mitch McConnell&amp;#39;s&lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2007/06/01/what-is-mcconnell-hiding&quot;&gt; efforts to shield&lt;/a&gt; the Republican Senator who put an anonymous hold on S.223, a bill to require electronic disclosure of Senators&amp;#39; campaign finance reports, even though McConnell is on the record in support of transparency?  Well, it&amp;#39;s just gotten stranger.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/27/tricky-mitch&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/06/27/tricky-mitch#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:07:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">180344 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No More Hold Ups</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/02/no-more-hold-ups</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The Baltimore Sun&lt;/em&gt; joins in in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/bal-ed.records02may02,0,7480460.story?coll=bal-opinion-headlines&quot;&gt;calling out&lt;/a&gt; Sen. Mitch McConnell and his fellow obstructors for standing in the way of a bill to require Senators to file campaign finance disclosure forms electronically.  Electronic disclosure would be a fast, inexpensive way to give voters better access to information about who was giving how much to their Senators (and whether they were getting anything in return).&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/02/no-more-hold-ups&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/02/no-more-hold-ups#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:20:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">161529 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Transparently Two-Faced</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/01/transparently-two-faced</link>
 <description>The &lt;em&gt;Louisville Courier-Journal&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2007/03/02/big-money-mitch&quot;&gt;no friend&lt;/a&gt; to Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007705010304&quot;&gt;blasts the longtime opponent of campaign finance reform&lt;/a&gt; for saying one thing and doing another: praising campaign finance transparency as the corrective on money in politics, then blocking legislation that would create that very transparency.  The &lt;em&gt;Journal &lt;/em&gt;expresses its considerable displeasure...&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/01/transparently-two-faced&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/01/transparently-two-faced#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">161087 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who&#039;s Blocking the Sun?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/23/whos-blocking-the-sun</link>
 <description>Which Senator is standing in the way of better campaign finance transparency?  The Sunlight Foundation is investigating who is holding up a bill to mandate electronic campaign finance filings.  They&amp;#39;ve identified five Senators who won&amp;#39;t say whether they put a hold on the bill, or whether they object to it: these five need to come clean.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/23/whos-blocking-the-sun&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/23/whos-blocking-the-sun#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance-disclosure">campaign finance disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:31:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">157845 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Quacks Like a Duck</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/19/quacks-like-a-duck</link>
 <description>If he &lt;em&gt;looks&lt;/em&gt; like a lobbyist, and &lt;em&gt;talks &lt;/em&gt;like a lobbyist, and &lt;em&gt;acts&lt;/em&gt; like a lobbyist, but doesn&amp;#39;t &lt;em&gt;call&lt;/em&gt; himself a lobbyist on campaign finance disclosure reports...then presidential candidates can take his money without having to look like they&amp;#39;re taking lobbyist cash, right?  &lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/veiled-lobbyists-give-700000-2007-04-18.html&quot;&gt;exposes the K Street equivalent&lt;/a&gt; of your mother writing &amp;quot;from Santa&amp;quot; on your Christmas presents.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/19/quacks-like-a-duck&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/04/19/quacks-like-a-duck#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/fundraising">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/presidential-race">presidential race</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:50:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">156505 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One Step Forward</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/02/one-step-forward</link>
 <description>It has been an uninspiring year, to say the least, when it comes to progress on restoring accountability in Congress.  But, as Senators Tom Coburn and Barack Obama write in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/a-322128~Sens__Tom_Coburn_and_Barack_Obama__Signs_of_hope_in_passage_of_transparency_bill.html&quot;&gt;this editorial&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;em&gt;The Examiner&lt;/em&gt;, there was a small victory last week in the battle to determine whether campaign contributions are being converted into legislative favors at the expense of taxpayers.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/02/one-step-forward&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/02/one-step-forward#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/tom-coburn">Tom Coburn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/transparency">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:01:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81052 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
