<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - judicial public financing</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/596/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Speech in Question</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/02/the-speech-in-question</link>
 <description>North Carolina was the first state to pass a law offering an option for state judicial candidates to seek office using a full public financing system.  Participation in the program has been high and public response has been sufficient to advance campaigns to offer a full public financing option for other races in the state.  But a group is challenging North Carolina&amp;#39;s law with the dubious &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot; argument which a group of judges says misses the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/columns/story/852448.html&quot;&gt;entire point of the program.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/02/the-speech-in-question&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/01/02/the-speech-in-question#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">215715 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contribute, Lest Ye Be Judged</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/29/contribute-lest-ye-be-judged</link>
 <description>Front page and above the fold in the &lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt; on Sunday &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/27/AR2007102701318.html&quot;&gt;was this piece &lt;/a&gt;on the increased profile of, and spending on judicial races.  As groups with particular interest in who sits on the bench funnel money into the races, the fair and impartial judiciary runs smack into political posturing.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/29/contribute-lest-ye-be-judged&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/10/29/contribute-lest-ye-be-judged#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-races">judicial races</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">204018 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bright Spot</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/30/bright-spot</link>
 <description>Ruth Marcus at the &lt;em&gt;Washington Post &lt;/em&gt;is a frequent critic of the excesses and absurdities of campaign finance and devotes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052901638.html&quot;&gt;her column today &lt;/a&gt;to the rising cost of judicial elections and attendant rise in vicious ad wars between candidates.  She notes a few bright spots, including the judicial public financing systems in North Carolina and, soon, in New Mexico.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/30/bright-spot&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/05/30/bright-spot#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-races">judicial races</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">171614 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is There a Doctor in the House?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/28/is-there-a-doctor-in-the-house</link>
 <description>Sharon F. Valentine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fayobserver.com/article?id=255839&quot;&gt;writes in&lt;/a&gt; North Carolina&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;Fayetteville Observer &lt;/em&gt;that the days of  “take an aspirin and call me in the morning” reform are over, and the cure to the corruption in our political system lies in more deep, systemic change: like Clean Elections.  North Carolina, shaken by Former House Speaker Jim Black&amp;#39;s guilty plea on corruption charges, has led the way with public financing of judicial campaigns, and will soon consider Clean Elections for Council of State Races.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/28/is-there-a-doctor-in-the-house&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2007/02/28/is-there-a-doctor-in-the-house#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">137675 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pilot Project in Washington</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/19/pilot-project-in-washington</link>
 <description>David Postman at &lt;em&gt;The Seattle Times&lt;/em&gt; is reporting that Governor Christine Gregoire &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/archives/2006/12/gregoire_wants_public_financing_of_judicial_campaigns.html&quot;&gt;has proposed &lt;/a&gt;a public financing pilot project for statewide judicial elections modeled on the public financing systems in place in North Carolina, Arizona, and Maine. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/19/pilot-project-in-washington&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/12/19/pilot-project-in-washington#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/washington">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112517 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are Judges for Sale?</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/20/are-judges-for-sale</link>
 <description>Forty-six million dollars.  That&amp;#39;s how much campaign cash was steered toward judicial candidates for state Supreme Courts in 2004.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2006/10/2nd_edit_filena.html&quot;&gt;This piece&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; blog argues judicial races have become &amp;quot;big-money brawls among special interests, often with big business and trial lawyers vying for a friendly judge on the court.&amp;quot;  It needs a fix - like a full public financing option.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/20/are-judges-for-sale&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2006/10/20/are-judges-for-sale#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">89251 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
